Several groups and individuals across
Nigeria have called on President Muhammadu Buhari to fulfil his promise
of naming those who stole from the country’s treasury.
Those who spoke to SUNDAY PUNCH in reaction to the list of recovered funds and assets published by the Federal Government on Saturday insisted that the names of those who returned their loot must be published to make the loot recovery process more transparent.
Those who spoke to SUNDAY PUNCH in reaction to the list of recovered funds and assets published by the Federal Government on Saturday insisted that the names of those who returned their loot must be published to make the loot recovery process more transparent.
President Buhari had on May 13, 2016, in
an interview he granted some journalists before he departed from London
where he attended an Anti-Corruption Summit organised by the British
Prime Minister, David Cameron, promised to disclose to Nigerians the
amount his government had so far recovered from those who looted the
nation’s treasury and their names on May 29.
The date, being Democracy Day, was when his administration clocked one.
Buhari said, “So far, what has come out;
what has been recovered in whatever currency from each ministry,
department and individual; I intend on the 29th to speak on these. This
is because of all what Nigerians are getting from the mass media;
because of the number of people arrested either by the Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission or Department of State Services. But we want
to make a comprehensive report on the 29th.”
When asked whether he would also publish
the names of the looters, Buhari replied, “Yes, eventually, it has to
be done because we want to successfully prosecute them. But you know you
cannot go to the courts unless you have documents for prosecution.
People signed for these monies into their personal accounts.”
When the Federal Government released the
list on Saturday, it had only the details of funds and assets recovered
and those pending locally and internationally. No name of any of those
from whom the funds and assets were recovered was mentioned.
The failure to name the looters had generated widespread reactions from members of the public on Saturday.
The Nigerian Bar Association urged the President to keep his promise by releasing the names of looters.
According to the President of the NBA, Mr. Augustine Alegeh (SAN), the revelation is important for citizens to gain closure.
He said, “For us, it is always important
that the promises our leaders make to the people are kept. I believe
that if there is any legal impediment that prevents the President, who
is a forthright person, from keeping a promise he has made to the
Nigerian people, he should let Nigerians know.
“It is also important that we know the
quantum of recoveries made from various persons so that it will be
something that is known to every Nigerian and there would be no
challenge. How did you arrive at the figures that are out there if you
don’t put not just names but reasons (to the recovered loots)?
“Tomorrow, you could hear that (after)
all the amounts that Mr. ‘A’ or Mr. ‘B’ looted, nothing was done. You
could also start to hear that the loot recovery was only targeted at
those who weren’t supporting the president.”
Alegeh noted that the only instance where the President could withhold the names was if there was a legal obstacle.
According to him, there are certain
transactions with confidentiality clauses, which make it impossible for
government to release the names. He said, should the government find
itself in such an instance, it should say so clearly.
The Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, on Saturday also told SUNDAY PUNCH that there was nothing revealing in the information the government published.
The Publicity Secretary of Afenifere,
Mr. Yinka Odumakin, told one of our correspondents that the amount
released as recovered loot was less than the total amount of figures
bandied about by the Federal Government and its agencies since the
anti-corruption campaign began.
He said, “As far as we are concerned,
there is nothing new on the list shown to Nigerians. Anybody can just
put figures together. Where are the particulars of the recovery? From
who were they (the loot) recovered?
“In the last one year, different rumours
have been flying about with regard to those who refunded billions of
naira and dollars. The figure they have released now is too opaque; it
is not transparent and does not lend credence to their claims. Anybody
can just write anything and throw it out (to the public).
“We need the particulars; from who were
the monies recovered? If they don’t do that, then, they are just wasting
our time; they are just making a mockery of the whole process. They
talked about naming and shaming, let them release the names. As it is
now, there is no revelation yet before Nigerians.”
Also, the Ijaw National Congress on
Saturday said the inability of Buhari to mention the names of the
country’s treasury looters was an indication that the President had
succumbed to pressure from the looters.
The spokesman for the INC, Mr. Victor
Burubo, who described the development as an anti-climax, stated that it
was not the first time the President would be doing so to Nigerians.
He said, “This is not the first time
they are doing this to Nigerians. In the appointment of ministers, the
President said he wanted to appoint spectacular people and this took him
six months. But he ended up appointing run-of-the-mill ministers.
“On the amount recovered as loot, many
figures were mentioned but we have virtually nothing. If the President
promised to name the looters and at the end, he could not do so, it
means he has succumbed to the pressure from the looters.”
Similarly, the Ohanaeze Youth Council,
the youth wing of the Ohanaeze Ndigbo, faulted the government’s failure
to disclose the identity of those that the sums were recovered from.
The President of the OYC, Mr. Okechukwu Isiguzoro, demanded full disclosure of the names of looters.
He said, “Nigerians have been
anticipating the release of the looters’ list for a while now; it is
disappointing that the government only came out with figures. Inasmuch
as the people need to know the amount that was recovered, they should
also know the identity of persons that stole the money.
“In fact, if the Federal Government is
sincerely fighting corruption, it should disclose the identity of those
that stole and returned money. It appears that there is a deliberate
attempt to shield looters and that is totally unacceptable. Nigerian
youths are not impressed.”
In the same vein, a member of the
Federal Parliament in the Second Republic and Convener of the Coalition
of Northern Politicians, Academics, Professionals and Businessmen, Dr.
Junaid Mohammed, stated that he had a “conflicted attitude towards the
funds.”
He said, “I don’t believe what is being
said to have been recovered was what was actually recovered. What was
stolen was more than what was recovered. If the government is sincere
about recovering the remaining money, they have to redouble their
efforts in recovering, as much as possible, all that was stolen and is
returned to the national treasury.
“I am not a lawyer, so I wouldn’t want
to venture into a legal opinion of the status of those who have stolen
the money. But if the law makes it difficult to disclose the names of
those who stole the money, their identities and their names will be
endangering the case itself. But, please, let the names be disclosed.”
Human rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana,
dismissed the amount the government said it had recovered as far less
than the true amount.
He said, “Let me tell you this: That
list is not correct. I know that the EFCC has recovered about $3.1bn. I
think this is just the report from a department; it is not a
comprehensive one.
“The figure announced has not taken
cognizance of the totality of the fund that has been recovered by all
the anti-graft agencies. From the information at my disposal, the figure
announced by the information minister is a fraction of what the EFCC
has recovered and deposited in the Central Bank of Nigeria.”
The Senior Advocate of Nigeria noted
that in order not to discourage more looters from returning stolen
funds, the Federal Government might not want to name the looters yet.
“In fact, some of the looters who have
stolen the bulk of the missing money, who are on the run, are being
pursued in different jurisdictions in the world,” Falana added.
In his submission, the Executive Chairman, Coalition Against Corrupt Leaders, Mr. Debo Adeniran, told SUNDAY PUNCH that those who had returned stolen money or from whom assets were recovered should be named, shamed and prosecuted.
Adeniran asked, “Is there any attempt to
cover up their atrocities? If we fight these looters and do not name
them, we are allowing them to go away with the dignity they falsely
acquired. They can still carry on with their lives as if nothing has
ever happened to indicate that they are corrupt. People will still
accord them respect. That is not fair; it does not augur well for
honest, hard-working Nigerians.
“Anybody trying to cover up on this
matter should be brought to book. Confessing to a crime is a first step
in anti-corruption crusade; those involved should be named, shamed and
prosecuted. Failure to do this will mean the government is conspiring
against the society.”
Similarly, the National Association of
Nigerian Students described the non-disclosure of looters’ names as a
failure on the President’s part.
The President of NANS, Mr. Tijani Usman,
said, “He (Buhari) has failed in his promise because he must be a man
of his word and we are looking up to him as a leader that Nigerian
students should emulate. If he has given us his word that on May 29,
Democracy Day, he would bring out the list of looters and he has failed
to do that, then where is his integrity?
“We have heard about his promise and
Nigerian students are not happy with that. We are urging him to live up
to his word and release the names of those looters who had stolen our
country’s money.”
The presidential candidate of the KOWA
Party in the 2015 election, Prof. Remi Sonaiya, also asked why the
Federal Government should protect the identities of those who returned
stolen funds and assets.
According to her, if the identities of
suspected beneficiaries of slush funds from the Office of the National
Security Adviser under Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.) were not shielded,
those whose loot has been recovered should not be shielded.
She said, “Just releasing a list is not
sufficient, considering the suffering the entire nation has gone
through. We demand more from the government. Making a list of recovered
loot and stolen assets is not sufficient as a deterrent for criminals.”
A former Vice-President of the Nigeria
Labour Congress, Mr. Issa Aremu, described the release of the list by
the Federal Government as significant and commendable.
But he said, “It is desirable to know
who the looters that have returned stolen money and assets are. It will
also be interesting to know those foreign government officials who aided
looters to stash stolen money abroad so that Nigerians can march in
protest at their embassies.”
On the list published by the Federal
Government on Saturday, the administration said it had recovered a total
of N115.7bn cash, while assets worth over N1.9tn had been frozen in one
year.
In a statement by the Minister of
Information, Culture and Tourism, Mr. Lai Mohammed, the government said
the recoveries were made between May 29, 2015 and May 25, 2016.
The government gave the breakdown of the loot as N78,325,354,631.82; $185,119,584.61; £3,508,355.46 and €11, 250.
A conversion of the funds using the
official exchange rate of the Central Bank of Nigeria, showed that the
amount adds up to N115,792,760,499.
The statement read in part, “The Federal
Government made cash recoveries totalling N78,325,354,631.82;
$185,119,584.61; £3,508,355.46 and €11,250 from May 29, 2015 to May 25,
2016.”
The monies were said to have been
recovered by the EFCC, the Office of the Attorney-General of the
Federation, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences
Commission and the DSS.
The Muhammadu Buhari-led government
added that a separate amount of cash and assets worth over N1.9tn had
also been seized. However, the properties and cash are under legal
contention.
The assets and cash seized under interim forfeiture totalled $9bn; N126bn; £2.4m and €303,399.
A conversion of the worth of assets and cash seized based on the official CBN exchange rate totalled: N1,918,113,864,063.
It added, “Recoveries under Interim
Forfeiture (cash and assets) during the period totalled
N126,563,481,095.43; $9,090,243,920.15; £2,484,447.55 and €303,399.17.”
The government added that funds awaiting return from foreign jurisdictions totalled $321,316,726.1; £6,900,000 and €11,826.11.
The statement added that 239 non-cash
recoveries such as farmlands, plots of land, uncompleted buildings,
completed buildings, vehicles and maritime vessels were also seized
during the period.
Meanwhile, the Socio-Economic Right
Accountability Project on Saturday said the Buhari-led administration
should expedite legal action against all looters in a bid to make their
identities known.
The Executive Director of SERAP, Mr.
Adetokunbo Mumuni, noted that the government should prosecute those who
had been investigated and found to have looted the nation’s treasury, in
order to avoid political witch-hunting.
He said, “Investigations should have
been concluded now. You cannot say you recovered money and since then,
you have not done any investigation, such that their (looters’)
arraignment in court will then be delayed. I don’t think that would be
justice.
“What the President should do is direct
the Attorney General to hasten the process for the looters to be
prosecuted. It is when we start seeing convictions from the court that
we know that they’ve actually committed the offence; that is what the
Nigerian constitution demands.” (Culled from Punch Newspapers. Retrieved June 5, 2016).
Attaching names to the figures will go a long way to strengthen the anti corruption fight which is already being perceived by some to be biased. Further than that, I propose a legislation be made barring the named looters from public office.Name and shame please.
ReplyDeleteYou are right, Chuka. By withholding the names, the government creates the impression of rewarding bad behaviour which leaves a big dent on the much touted anti-corruption crusade!
ReplyDelete